Supreme Court of India: Addressing Farmers' Protests and Upholding Justice

The Supreme Court of India has played a pivotal role in addressing the ongoing farmers' protests against the controversial farm laws enacted in 2020. This blog explores the Supreme Court's stance on these laws, its historical background, and its broader role in contemporary issues. The farmers' protests have emerged as one of the largest movements in India's history, prompting the judiciary to intervene amid escalating tensions between the government and the agricultural community.

Popular Blogs

ICC Champions Trophy 2025: Schedule, Teams, Venues & More

on December 25, 2024

World Test Championship 2024-25 Points Table

on December 24, 2024

Aus vs Ind: Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2024 – History & Key Fixtures

on December 14, 2024

Gukesh Dommaraju: Youngest Chess World Champion at 18 Years

on December 13, 2024

GRAP 4 Restrictions in Delhi-NCR: What's Open and Shut?

on December 17, 2024

Russia’s mRNA Cancer Vaccine: A Groundbreaking Step in Oncology

on January 09, 2025

Lulu Mall in India - Complete List of Lulu Malls, and Key Facts

on December 26, 2024

Historical Background of the Supreme Court of India

Image Source: Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of India was established on January 26, 1950, coinciding with the enforcement of the Indian Constitution. It replaced both the Federal Court of India and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which had previously served as the highest judicial authorities in India. The first Chief Justice, H.J. Kania, presided over the inaugural session on January 28, 1950, at the Chamber of Princes in the old Parliament building.

Initially, the Supreme Court was envisioned to consist of a Chief Justice and seven judges, but this number has since expanded to a maximum of 34 judges. The court's primary role is to uphold the Constitution and interpret laws, ensuring justice across the nation. It operates under original, appellate, and advisory jurisdictions, making it a crucial institution for safeguarding fundamental rights.

The court initially functioned from the Parliament building until it moved to its current premises in 1958. Over the years, it has played a significant role in landmark judgments that have shaped Indian law and society, establishing itself as a guardian of democracy and justice in India.

PROMOTION

Comfortable PGs & Hostels for All Budgets – Search Today!

Find PG/Hostel Now

Role of the Supreme Court in Contemporary Issues

Image Source: Google

Addressing the Farmers' Protest

The Supreme Court of India has actively engaged with the ongoing farmers' protests, which have been fueled by demands for legal guarantees on Minimum Support Prices (MSP) and other agricultural reforms. The court has emphasized the importance of dialogue between the government and farmers while ensuring that public order is maintained. Recently, it deferred hearings regarding farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal's health and the Punjab government's compliance with orders to provide medical assistance, highlighting its role as a mediator in this crisis. The court has also appointed committees to facilitate discussions, although some farmer unions have chosen to boycott these meetings, expressing dissatisfaction with the process.

Judicial Stance on the Farm Laws

The Supreme Court's judicial stance on the contentious farm laws has been cautious yet proactive. It has stayed the implementation of these laws, recognizing the potential harm they could cause to farmers' livelihoods. The court's approach reflects a commitment to safeguarding fundamental rights while navigating complex socio-political dynamics. By prioritizing compliance with its orders and advocating for negotiations, the Supreme Court aims to balance the interests of farmers with the need for legislative reform.

PROMOTION

Discover Thousands of Verified Homes Near You! - On HexaHome

Start Search Now

Bench and Plea Hearing in the Farm's Case

The Supreme Court of India has played a significant role in the ongoing legal and social discourse surrounding the farmers' protests against the three controversial farm laws. On January 12, 2021, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Sharad Bobde ordered an interim stay on the implementation of these laws, recognizing the urgent need to address farmers' grievances and facilitate dialogue between them and the government. This decision followed multiple hearings where the court emphasized the protection of farmers' rights to protest while maintaining public order.

The court's bench has heard various petitions challenging the constitutionality of the farm laws, including those supporting their implementation and others arguing that protests violate residents' rights. In its deliberations, the bench established a four-member committee to mediate discussions between farmers and government representatives, aiming to create a conducive environment for negotiations. The court's intervention reflects its commitment to balancing fundamental rights with legislative authority, demonstrating a proactive approach in addressing contemporary issues affecting agriculture and rural livelihoods in India. As the situation evolves, the court's decisions will continue to shape public policy and farmer welfare.

PROMOTION

List Your Property in Minutes – Join HexaHome Now!

Join & List your property now

Stand of Supreme Courton Farm's laws

Image Source: Google

The Supreme Court of India has taken a significant stance regarding the controversial farm laws that sparked widespread protests among farmers. On January 12, 2021, the court issued an interim stay on the implementation of these laws—namely, the Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, the Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act. The court's decision came in response to petitions challenging the constitutionality of the laws and concerns over public order due to ongoing protests.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the government must take responsibility for resolving the farmers' strike, indicating that dialogue was essential to address the underlying issues. It established a committee to facilitate negotiations between farmers and government representatives, aiming to create a constructive dialogue space. While some farmer unions have expressed dissatisfaction with this approach, arguing for a complete repeal of the laws, the court's intervention reflects its commitment to balancing farmers' rights with legislative authority. The Supreme Court's actions highlight its role as a mediator in contemporary socio-political issues, striving to uphold justice while navigating complex agricultural reforms.

Jurisdiction and Powers

The Supreme Court of India operates under three primary types of jurisdiction: original, appellate, and advisory.

Image Source: Supreme Court of India

Original Jurisdiction

Under Article 131, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to hear disputes between the Union and states or among states themselves. This includes cases involving federal disputes, such as conflicts over constitutional interpretation or the enforcement of fundamental rights under Article 32, where individuals can approach the court directly for redress.

Appellate Jurisdiction

The appellate jurisdiction allows the Supreme Court to hear appeals against judgments from High Courts and tribunals, as outlined in Articles 132 to 134. This jurisdiction ensures uniformity in legal interpretations across the country and serves as a mechanism for correcting errors made by lower courts.

Advisory Jurisdiction

The court also has advisory jurisdiction under Article 143, where it can provide opinions on legal questions referred by the President of India. This role helps guide legislative processes and clarify legal ambiguities.

In addition to these jurisdictions, the Supreme Court possesses powers of judicial review, enabling it to invalidate laws that violate constitutional provisions. Its decisions are binding on all courts in India, reinforcing its role as the highest judicial authority in the country.

The Collegium System

The Collegium System of the Supreme Court of India is a mechanism for the appointment and transfer of judges that has evolved through judicial pronouncements rather than legislative action. This system emerged from a series of landmark judgments known as the "Three Judges Cases," which established that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and a group of senior judges would have the primary role in judicial appointments.

The First Judges Case (1981) initially allowed the executive some influence over appointments, but this was overturned in the Second Judges Case (1993), which emphasized that "consultation" meant "concurrence," thus prioritizing the judiciary's role. The Third Judges Case (1998) further expanded the Collegium to include the CJI and four senior-most judges, solidifying its authority in appointing judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts.

While this system aims to maintain judicial independence, it has faced criticism for its lack of transparency and accountability, leading to calls for reform. The government has argued that such a system is opaque and delays judicial appointments, contributing to a backlog of cases in Indian courts. Despite these criticisms, the Collegium remains the prevailing method for judicial appointments in India, reflecting an ongoing tension between judicial independence and executive oversight.

Architecture of the Supreme Court Building

Image Source: Google

The Supreme Court of India, inaugurated on August 4, 1958, features a distinctive architectural design that symbolizes justice. Designed by chief architect Ganesh Bhikaji Deolalikar, the building is shaped like a balance scale, reflecting the core principles of justice. The Central Wing represents the beam of the scale, housing the Chief Justice's court, while the Right and Left Wings symbolize the scale's arms, accommodating various courtrooms and administrative offices.

The structure is built on a triangular plot of 17 acres and showcases an Indo-British architectural style, blending local elements with colonial aesthetics. A prominent feature is its 27.6-meter-high dome and spacious colonnaded verandah, which enhance its grandeur. The building's exterior is adorned with red sandstone, aligning it with other significant structures in New Delhi.

In addition to its symbolic design, the Supreme Court complex has undergone several expansions since its inception, including new wings added in 1979 and 1994 to accommodate growing judicial needs. The architecture not only serves functional purposes but also embodies the ideals of justice and democracy in India, making it a landmark in the nation's capital.

Constitutional Framework

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The Constitutional Framework of the Supreme Court of India is primarily outlined in Part V, Chapter IV of the Indian Constitution, which encompasses Articles 124 to 147. Established on January 26, 1950, the Supreme Court serves as the highest judicial authority in the country, tasked with upholding the Constitution and ensuring justice.

Establishment and Composition

According to Article 124, the Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and a number of other judges as determined by Parliament, currently capped at 34 judges. The appointment of judges is made by the President of India based on recommendations from the Chief Justice and other senior judges.

Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court possesses original jurisdiction over disputes involving the Union and states, appellate jurisdiction to hear appeals from lower courts, and advisory jurisdiction to provide opinions on legal matters referred by the President. It also has the power of judicial review, enabling it to invalidate laws that contravene constitutional provisions.

Role and Significance

As a guardian of fundamental rights, the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in interpreting laws and resolving conflicts between citizens and the state. Its decisions are binding on all courts in India, reinforcing its position as a cornerstone of India's democratic framework.

Ensuring Judicial Independence

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Ensuring judicial independence is a cornerstone of the Supreme Court of India, vital for upholding democracy and the rule of law. The Constitution provides a robust framework to protect this independence through several key provisions.

Separation of Powers

The Constitution enshrines the separation of powers among the legislature, executive, and judiciary, ensuring that each branch operates independently. This separation is crucial for preventing any undue influence from the executive or legislative branches on judicial functions.

Appointment and Tenure

Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President based on recommendations from the Collegium System, which includes the Chief Justice and senior judges. This system aims to insulate judicial appointments from political pressures. Furthermore, judges enjoy security of tenure until the age of 65, making their positions less vulnerable to external influences.

Judicial Review

The power of judicial review, explicitly provided in Articles 13, 32, and 136, allows the Supreme Court to invalidate laws that contravene constitutional provisions. This power is essential for maintaining checks and balances within the government.

Accountability

While independence is paramount, the judiciary is also accountable to the public. Mechanisms exist for the removal of judges in cases of misbehavior or incapacity, ensuring that judicial accountability does not undermine independence. Overall, these constitutional safeguards collectively reinforce the Supreme Court's role as an independent arbiter of justice in India.

Landmark Judgments of the Supreme Court

Landmark judgments of the Supreme Court of India have significantly shaped constitutional law and social justice in the country. Some notable cases include:

1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): This case established the Basic Structure Doctrine, asserting that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered or destroyed by amendments.

2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): The court expanded the interpretation of Article 21, ruling that the right to life includes the right to live with dignity, thereby emphasizing the importance of due process.

3. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980): This judgment reinforced the Basic Structure Doctrine, declaring that Parliament cannot amend the Constitution to grant itself unlimited powers.

4. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): The Supreme Court laid down guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace, marking a significant step toward gender equality and women's rights.

5. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018): This landmark ruling decriminalized homosexuality by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, affirming the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals.

6. Triple Talaq Judgment (2017): The court declared the practice of instant triple talaq unconstitutional, promoting gender justice within Muslim personal law.

These judgments reflect the Supreme Court's role as a guardian of fundamental rights and its commitment to upholding justice in contemporary Indian society.

Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The Supreme Court of India, while hailed as one of the most powerful courts globally, faces significant challenges that impact its effectiveness and public perception. One of the primary issues is the backlog of cases, with nearly 70,000 pending appeals and petitions, which severely hampers timely justice delivery. This backlog not only frustrates litigants but also undermines the court's core mission of upholding rights and ensuring justice.

Furthermore, the administrative practices within the court, particularly regarding case listings and prioritization, have come under scrutiny. Critics argue that the Chief Justice's discretionary power in listing cases often leads to a focus on expediency over substantive legal principles. This approach can result in important cases being sidelined in favor of those that are easier to dispose of quickly, potentially diluting the quality of judicial outcomes.

Additionally, there are concerns about the erosion of judicial independence, particularly regarding appointments and transfers of judges. The Collegium system, while designed to insulate judicial appointments from political influence, has faced criticism for its lack of transparency and accountability.

In summary, while the Supreme Court remains a vital institution for protecting constitutional rights in India, addressing these critical challenges is essential for restoring public confidence and enhancing its role as a guardian of justice.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court of India has played a crucial role in the ongoing farmers' protests by staying the implementation of the contentious farm laws since January 2021. This intervention aimed to protect farmers' rights while facilitating dialogue between stakeholders. As of December 2024, farmers continue to advocate for legally guaranteed minimum support prices (MSP), reflecting their persistent demands for legislative reforms. The court's actions underscore its commitment to ensuring justice and addressing public grievances, highlighting the need for comprehensive consultations in future agricultural reforms to foster acceptance and stability within the farming community.