One Nation, One Election: Concept, Challenges, and it's Future

The "One Nation, One Election" initiative in India proposes a significant transformation of the electoral landscape by advocating for simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and all state legislative assemblies. This concept aims to streamline the electoral process, reducing the frequency of elections and associated costs while enhancing governance efficiency. The proposal has gained traction in recent years, particularly under the current government, which views it as a means to minimize electoral fatigue among voters and promote a more stable political environment.

PROMOTION

Discover Thousands of Verified Homes Near You! - On HexaHome

Start Search Now

About Simultaneous Elections

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The concept of simultaneous elections, encapsulated in the phrase "One Nation, One Election," refers to the proposal of conducting elections for the Lok Sabha (the lower house of India's Parliament) and all state legislative assemblies at the same time. This initiative aims to streamline the electoral process in India, reducing the frequency of elections and minimizing associated costs and disruptions.

The rationale behind this approach is to consolidate the electoral calendar, thereby allowing governments to focus on governance rather than being perpetually engaged in electioneering. Currently, elections in India are staggered, with different states holding elections at different times, leading to a situation where political parties and candidates are in a constant state of campaigning.

PROMOTION

Your Affordable Stay is Just a Click Away! - On HexaHome

Find Pg/Hostel on HexaHome

History

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The idea of simultaneous elections is not new; it has been discussed in various forms since India's independence in 1947. The first Lok Sabha elections were held in 1951-52, and initially, state assembly elections were synchronized with them. However, due to various political developments, including the dissolution of assemblies and changes in party dynamics, this synchronization was lost.

In 1967, the first instance of non-concurrent state assembly elections occurred when several states went to polls at different times. This trend continued, leading to a fragmented electoral cycle that has persisted for decades. The issue gained renewed attention in recent years, particularly with the rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which included simultaneous elections as part of its electoral manifesto.

PROMOTION

Zero Brokerage, endless possibilities – Start searching now!

Explore Properties Now

Reasoning and Need

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The proponents of "One Nation, One Election" argue that simultaneous elections could lead to several benefits:

• Cost Reduction: Conducting simultaneous elections is expected to save significant amounts of money that are currently spent on multiple election cycles across various states.

• Administrative Efficiency: It would reduce the burden on the Election Commission of India (ECI) and other administrative bodies involved in organizing elections.

• Focus on Governance: With fewer elections, governments can concentrate on policy-making and governance instead of being perpetually in campaign mode.

• Voter Turnout: It is believed that simultaneous elections could increase voter turnout as citizens would be more engaged when they have multiple issues to vote on at once.

However, critics argue that this approach could undermine local issues and diminish the accountability of elected representatives.

PROMOTION

Discover Thousands of Verified Homes Near You! - On HexaHome

Start Search Now

High-Level Committee

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The High-Level Committee on "One Nation, One Election," chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind, was established on September 2, 2023, to explore the feasibility and implications of conducting simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and state legislative assemblies in India. This initiative aims to address the challenges posed by frequent elections, which often disrupt governance and place significant burdens on administrative resources.

The committee's formation followed a growing consensus among various political stakeholders regarding the potential benefits of synchronized elections, including cost savings and increased governmental efficiency. Over a period of 191 days, the committee engaged in extensive consultations with political parties, civil society organizations, and legal experts to gather diverse perspectives on the proposal. Ultimately, 32 out of 47 political parties expressed support for simultaneous elections, highlighting a significant level of agreement among stakeholders.

In its report submitted in March 2024, the committee outlined several key recommendations. These included a phased approach to implementing simultaneous elections: initially synchronizing Lok Sabha and state assembly elections, followed by aligning local body elections (municipalities and panchayats) within 100 days of the general elections. The committee also proposed necessary constitutional amendments to facilitate this transition, emphasizing the need for a legally tenable mechanism to restore a cycle of simultaneous elections.

The recommendations have garnered attention from the Union Cabinet, which accepted them for further consideration. As discussions continue in Parliament, the committee's findings are expected to play a crucial role in shaping India's electoral framework and addressing concerns related to governance and representation in the democratic process.

The key recommendations included:

• Amending Articles related to the duration and dissolution of legislative bodies.

• Establishing a framework for conducting local body elections within a specified timeframe relative to national and state elections.

Reactions

Image Source: Adobe Stock

The proposal has elicited mixed reactions from various political parties and stakeholders:

• Support from BJP: The ruling BJP has strongly advocated for the initiative, framing it as a step towards efficient governance and reduced electoral expenditure.

• Opposition Concerns: Opposition parties have raised concerns about potential threats to federalism and local governance. Critics like Congress leader Jairam Ramesh have argued that if a state government loses its majority mid-term, citizens could be left without representation for extended periods.

• Public Sentiment: Public opinion is divided; while some appreciate the potential efficiency gains, others worry about the implications for local issues and representation.

Challenges and Complexities of Simultaneous Elections

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Implementing simultaneous elections poses several challenges:

• Constitutional Amendments: Significant changes to the Constitution are required to synchronize election schedules, which necessitates broad political consensus—a challenging task given India's diverse political landscape.

• Logistical Issues: Organizing nationwide elections simultaneously would require an enormous increase in resources, including electronic voting machines (EVMs) and personnel.

• Political Resistance: Many regional parties fear that simultaneous elections could dilute their influence by overshadowing local issues with national narratives.

Moreover, there are concerns about how such a system would handle unexpected political events—such as a party losing majority support mid-term—without leaving constituents unrepresented.

Future

Image Source: iStock & VikramRaghuvanshi

Looking ahead, the success of "One Nation, One Election" will depend on:

• Political Consensus: Achieving agreement among various political factions is crucial for constitutional amendments.

• Public Engagement: Educating voters about the benefits and implications of simultaneous elections could help garner public support.

• Pilot Programs: Implementing pilot programs in select states may provide insights into operational feasibility before a nationwide rollout.

The future trajectory will likely involve ongoing debates within Parliament and among civil society as stakeholders assess both potential benefits and drawbacks.

Conclusion

The "One Nation, One Election" initiative represents a significant shift in India's electoral landscape. While it promises efficiency gains and cost savings, it also raises critical questions about representation, accountability, and federalism. As discussions continue and legislative proposals are debated, it remains to be seen whether India can navigate these complexities to create a more unified electoral process that truly serves its diverse population.